Both bot and viharn follow identical architectural styles, being
rectangular buildings with sweeping multi-tiered roofs covered with
glazed brown and green or blue tiles. Each end of the roof's peak
terminates in a gilded finial known as a cho fa, or "sky tassel".
A gracefully curved ornamentation, it looks like a slender bird's
neck and head, and is generally believed to represent the mythical
Garuda, half bird, half man.
Along with the bot and viharn, the most characteristic of temple
structures is the chedi or stupa. Dominating the compound of a wat,
this is a tall decorative spire constructed over relics of the Buddha,
sacred texts or an image. Essentially they are two basic forms:
bell-shaped and raised on square or round terraces of diminishing
size, and tapering to a thin spire, or a round, finger-like tower.
The latter, derived from Khmer architecture and symbolic of the
mythical mountain abode of the gods, is known as a prang.
Other buildings in a temple compound can include a library for sacred
texts, and a mondop. Traditionally the former was built on stilts
over a pond to protect the fragile manuscripts from ants. The mondop
is a square-shaped building with tapering roof enshrining some relic,
often a Buddha footprint, a decorated stone impression far larger
than lifesize. These, like the chedi, are not merely architectural
features, they also serve as monuments in the true sense, objects
to instruct and focus the mind.
Some larger wats may also have cloisters, open-sided galleries perhaps
displaying rows of Buddha images, while bell towers and various
pavilions can be additional features.
Wats further have a crematorium, identified by its needle-like chimney
and, usually, a school for monks and perhaps also for lay children.
These buildings are indicative of one of the traditional functions
of a temple which extended beyond those of a place of worship and
home to a religious community.
Rather like a medieval Christian church, the Thai temple was the
focal point of every village. Unlike the church, however, it served
far more than the community's spiritual needs. In the past, and
still today in some rural areas, cultural life revolved around the
wat which stood as social services centre, school, hospital, dispensary,
hostelry, and village news, employment and information agency.
The most vivid illustration of the wat's community role and social
focal point these days is the annual temple fair. Most wats continue
the tradition of what are essentially fund-raising events, but also
occasions for sanuk, having fun. At these times the normally quiet
temple compound becomes filled with swings and roundabouts, sideshows,
likay (folk opera) theatre shows and all the other typical fun-of-the-fair
amusements, while the otherwise serene air is rent by loudspeakers
blaring out raucous Thai music. In Bangkok, Wat Saket has the biggest
of these affairs.
In a more serious vein, the temple has also been the storehouse
of knowledge, sacred and profane (as with herbal medicine, for example)
and monks, as one commentator has put it, "provided the vasty majority
of the inhabitants of pre-modern Siam with the ultimate basis for
making sense of the world."
Thailand's high literacy rate, both now and in the past, owes much
to temple schools where youngsters are taught to read the sacred
texts. On the day-to-day practical level abbots will also often
take the lead in instigating community projects such as digging
a village well.
Most fascinating from the visitor's point of view is the temple
as art centre. Unlike the wat's other functions, this role was unwittingly
assumed. Until the modern period all Thai art was religious art,
it had no conscious aesthetic function and served purely didactic
and devotional aims. Thus sculpture, painting
and the minor arts, such as gilt on lacquer, mother-of-pearl inlay
and woodcarving, found expression almost exclusively in temple decoration.
More.